![]() At this type of site, when you open the NoScript menu, you ignore the black listed sites and deal only with the ones labeled default. I have a large black list, compare the end of my Options page to the one you posted in your article.Ĭlick to expand.Using a black list doesn't break things, but it makes things safer and easier when you go to a new site with a bunch of domains and you need to allow a few for the site to work. In NoScript 10, unlike version 5, all trusted and untrusted domains are in one list. Building your black list also make things work out pretty well when you allow sites temporarily (this setting will make it back in the future) or when you land in a new site and you need to temp allow one or 2 domains to run. This is huge, for example, when you Allow scripts globally, all scripts are allowed to run (the ones under Default), but not the ones in your Untrusted list. To me personally, blacklisting/untrusting sites is more important than white listing. You said, "As you can see below, the UNTRUSTED scope does not have any elements (capabilities), nor sites at the moment, and custom is also empty." The Untrusted list looks empty for you, because you are not black listing sites. After doing that, when you reopen Options, sites wont appear in the list anymore. When you visit a site, if you want to delete a site that's white listed or black listed, just move the toggle to default. About deleting whitelisted entries, you dont need to use the debug button.You can delete white listed and black listed sites from the UI. That way, NoScript 10 would treat all scripts when you visit websites as Untrusted (like before), except the ones that you have white listed.Īnother thing. I think whats best is to set Default as it was in version 5, no permissions at all, look below. I think its a little easier doing it via the Trusted button.īy the way, MrKvonic, good article, I ll make some comment about some of the things you said. Temporarily allowing sites can be done 2 ways, via clicking the Custom button or the Trusted button. ![]() If you do it right, allowing temp permissions works identically as it did before: Sites go back to default when you restart the browser. So, look at the clock as it changes size. It becomes a little bigger when the permission is set as temporary. You just have to be a little more careful now than before "as you have to make sure the little clock gets actually clicked when you click it". Experts do agree: Firefox is really safer with NoScript -)Ĭheck this user-contributed NoScript 10 primer.Īnd this NoScript 10 "Quantum" vs NoScript 5 "Classic" (or "Legacy") comparison.Click to expand.For me personally, allowing per site temporarily works 100% of the time. Such a preemptive approach prevents exploitation of security vulnerabilities (known and unknown!) with no loss of functionality where you need it. It protects your "trust boundaries" against cross-site scripting attacks (XSS), cross-zone DNS rebinding / CSRF attacks (router hacking), and Clickjacking attempts, thanks to its unique ClearClick technology. your banking site), thus mitigating remotely exploitable vulnerabilities, such as Spectre and Meltdown. ![]() It allows JavaScript, Flash, and other executable content to run only from trusted domains of your choice (e.g. Winner of the "PC World - World Class Award" and bundled with the Tor Browser, NoScript gives you the best available protection on the web.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |